Caracterización de las cirugías laparoscópicas en el Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital Materno-Infantil Ángel Arturo Aballí

Introducción: La cirugía laparoscópica ginecológica permite intervenir a la paciente sin tener que abrir el abdomen, pues consiste en realizar pequeñas incisiones. Actualmente se emplea en enfermedades como el cáncer o en la extracción de quistes y miomas, por lo que se puede aplicar en casi cualquier intervención de cirugía ginecológica. Objetivo: Caracterizar los procedimientos laparoscópicos del Servicio de Ginecología en el Hospital Materno-Infantil Ángel Arturo Aballí en el período comprendido entre enero del 2018 y diciembre del 2021. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte longitudinal con el fin de describir la actividad asistencial laparoscópica. La muestra fue de 180 pacientes, según el criterio de selección no probabilístico de los investigadores. Resultados: La edad promedio fue 41,6 años. Según los antecedentes, predominó el tamaño del útero con 91,1 % (n = 164). Dentro de las indicaciones quirúrgicas, se encontró la paridad satisfecha en un 34,4 %, seguido del tumor de ovario (18,9 %), las neoplasias intraepiteliales cervicales (13,4 %) y el fibroma uterino sintomático. En cuanto a la cirugía mayor, se encontró la histerectomía abdominal laparoscópica en un 49,0 % (n = 78), seguido de la salpingectomía con un 38,9 %, resultados con significación desde el punto de vista estadístico (p = 0,004). En cuanto a la cirugía menor, el 11,6 % de la muestra recibió la ablación de los focos endometriales. Las complicaciones fueron escasas. Conclusiones: Los procederes laparoscópicos del Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital Materno-Infantil Ángel Arturo Aballí se consideraron adecuados de acuerdo a los indicadores quirúrgicos.

Introduction: Laparoscopic gynecological surgery allows for the patient to undergo surgery without having to open their abdomen, since it consists in making small incisions. It is currently used in diseases such as cancer or in the removal of cysts and myomas; therefore, it can be applied in almost any gynecological surgery. Objective: To characterize the laparoscopic procedures of the gynecology service at Hospital Materno-Infantil Ángel Arturo Aballí, in the period from January 2018 to December 2021. Methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective and longitudinal study was carried out in order to describe the laparoscopic assistance activity. The sample consisted of 180 patients, according to the researchers' nonprobabilistic selection criteria. Results: The mean age was 41.6 years. Concerning antecedents, uterine size predominated, with 91.1% (n = 164). Among surgical indications, satisfied parity was found in 34.4%, followed by ovarian tumor (18.9%), cervical intraepithelial neoplasms (13.4 %) and symptomatic uterine fibroid. With respect to major surgery, laparoscopic abdominal hysterectomy was found in 49.0 % (n = 78), followed by salpingectomy, with 38.9%; such results are statistically significant (p = 0.004). Regarding minor surgery, 11.6% of the sample received ablation of endometrial focuses. Complications were rare. Conclusions: The laparoscopic procedures of the gynecology service at Hospital Materno-Infantil Ángel Arturo Aballí are considered adequate according to the surgical indicators.

Biopsia ganglionar retroperitoneal por laparoscopia

Introducción: La biopsia ganglionar retroperitoneal es un procedimiento frecuentemente requerido en el estudio de neoplasias; resulta deseable optimizar su rendimiento con baja morbilidad. Este artículo describe la utilidad y complicaciones de biopsias ganglionares retroperitoneales por laparoscopia en una institución oncológica de Latinoamérica. Material y Métodos: Cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con biopsia ganglionar retroperitoneal o mesentérica laparoscópica entre 2011 y 2021 en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, en Bogotá, Colombia. Se recogieron datos demográficos, quirúrgicos, complicaciones y mortalidad a 30 días, resultados histopatológicos y su rol en la clínica. Resultados: Se incluyeron 41 pacientes; 73% con diagnóstico de malignidad, principalmente linfoma. La indicación fue mayormente sospecha de recaída, seguida por sospecha de enfermedad hematológica de novo. Siempre se obtuvo tejido adecuado y suficiente para diagnóstico histológico. Requirieron conversión a laparotomía cinco pacientes (12%). No hubo complicaciones Clavien-Dindo III /IV ni mortalidad a 30 días. Se presentó morbilidad grado I o II en 3 casos (7%) y un incidente intraoperatorio grado III. Conclusión: La naturaleza invasiva y el carácter diagnóstico de la biopsia retroperitoneal laparoscópica, constituyen un desafío frecuente en la práctica del cirujano general. La planeación estratégica e individualizada y la técnica quirúrgica depurada son las claves para lograr el máximo rendimiento, con baja morbimortalidad.

Introduction: Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy is a frequently required procedure in the study of neoplasms; it is desirable to optimize its performance with low morbidity. This paper describes the usefulness and complications of retroperitoneal lymph node biopsies by laparoscopy in a cancer institution in Latin America. Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with laparoscopic retroperitoneal or mesenteric lymph node biopsy between 2011 and 2021 at the National Cancer Institute, in Bogotá, Colombia. Demographic and surgical data, complications and 30-day mortality, histopathological results and their clinical role were collected. Results: 41 patients were included; 73% diagnosed with malignancy, mainly lymphoma. The indication was mostly suspected relapse, followed by suspected de novo hematologic disease. Adequate and sufficient tissue was always obtained for histological diagnosis. Five patients (12%) required conversion to laparotomy. There were no Clavien-Dindo III/IV complications or 30-day mortality. Grade I or II morbidity occurred in 3 cases (7%) and a grade III intraoperative incident. Conclusion: The invasive nature and diagnostic character of laparoscopic retroperitoneal biopsy constitute a frequent challenge in the practice of the general surgeon. Strategic and individualized planning and a refined surgical technique are the keys to achieving maximum performance, with low morbidity and mortality.

Clinical Efficacy of Concept of Membrane Anatomy with Complete Mesangectomy in Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer / 肿瘤防治研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between traditional laparoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery under the guidance of membrane anatomy with complete mesangectomy in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 60 patients with rectal cancer who were randomly divided into control group (n=30) and observation group (n=30) in accordance with the principle of randomization.The control group received traditional laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, and the observation group received laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer under the guidance of membrane anatomy with complete mesangectomy.The different clinical application effects of the two groups were analyzed by comparing the general data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative rehabilitation. Results All the 60 patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.No operation-related complications, conversion to laparotomy, or perioperative death cases were reported.No statistically significant differences in age, gender, operation time, postoperative exhaust time, drainage tube removal time, or postoperative complications were found between the two groups (all P > 0.05).Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and more lymph node dissected (P < 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer guided by the membrane anatomy with complete mesangectomy can completely remove the mesorectum, enlarge and clear the surgical field, reduce intraoperative bleeding, thoroughly remove lymph nodes, and improve the quality of surgery.

Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis on the surgery-chemotherapy interval: a propensity score matching analysis / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective:To compare the effects of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis on the interval between surgery and chemotherapy, the perioperative outcomes and the prognosis of patients.Methods:A total of 127 patients undergoing colorectal cancer liver metastasis resection in the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, from January 2014 to February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 81 males and 46 females, aged (60.0±8.9) years. Based on surgical approaches, the patients were divided into the laparoscopic group ( n=33) and the open group ( n=94). After propensity score matching (PSM), 26 cases in the laparoscopic group were matched with 45 cases in the open group. The maximum tumor diameter, proportion of tumors involving both lobes, and proportion of solitary tumors, interval between surgery and first cycle of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and the prognosis of patients were compared between the two groups after matching. Survival curves and rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. Results:After PSM, there were no significant differences in the baseline data of patients, including tumor maximum diameter, proportion of tumors involving both lobes, and proportion of solitary tumors between the two groups (all P>0.05), indicating comparability. After matching, the interval between surgery and first cycle of chemotherapy in the laparoscopic group (34.4±11.2) d was shorter than that in the open group (46.7±28.0) d, the laparoscopic group had a lower incidence of postoperative complications[0 vs 20.0%(9/45)] and a shorter postoperative hospital stay[6.0 (5.0, 6.2) d vs 8.0 (7.0, 11.5) d] compared to the open group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate (χ 2=3.27, P=0.070) and the cumulative survival rate (χ 2=0.001, P=0.974) between the two groups. Conclusion:In patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis, laparoscopic liver surgery showed a lower incidence of postoperative complications and a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to open surgery. The interval between surgery and first cycle of chemotherapy is shorter after laparoscopic surgery. The long-term prognosis is comparable in the laparoscopic and open surgery.

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma at specific sites of liver / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at specific sites of liver.Methods:Data of patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy in Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University from September 2014 to May 2019 were retrospective analyzed. A total of 205 patients were enrolled, including 174 males and 31 females, aged (56.7±11.3) years. According to the surgical methods, patients were divided into laparoscopic group ( n=105) and open group ( n=100). The Child-Pugh score, maximum tumor diameter, tumor location, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complication rate, liver function(glutamate transaminase, alanine transaminase, etc.) and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Postoperative survival and recurrence were followed up. Survival curves and rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. Results:There were no significant differences in Child-Pugh score, maximum tumor diameter, tumor location between the two groups. Compared to the open group, the laparoscopic group had a decreased blood loss [100 (50, 200) ml vs 150 (100, 200) ml], a lower incidence of postoperative complications[7.6%(8/105) vs 17.0%(17/100)], and a shorter hospital stay [(8.6±1.9) days vs (13.0±3.4) days](all P<0.05). The postoperative glutamate transaminase and alanine transaminase levels were lower in the laparoscopic group than those in the open group. The 1, 3, 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between the two groups (χ 2=0.56, 0.21, P=0.456, 0.648). Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of HCC at specific sites of liver is a safe, feasible and effective procedure.

The efficacy of laparoscopic ovarian cyst aspiration in the treatment of neonatal simple ovarian cyst / 中国新生儿科杂志

Objective:To study the efficacy of laparoscopic ovarian cyst aspiration in the treatment of neonatal simple ovarian cyst.Methods:From August 2019 to December 2021, infants with neonatal simple ovarian cyst receiving laparoscopic ovarian cyst aspiration in the Department of Pediatrics of Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital were retrospectively studied. The clinical characteristics, age of surgery, operation duration, length of hospital stay, complications and follow-up were analyzed.Results:A total of 6 full-term infants were included. Simple ovarian cysts were located on the right side of the body in 5 cases and on the left in 1 case. The average cyst diameter was (6.1±1.4) cm, the surgery were performed at 2~5 d of age, the average duration of the surgery was (18.8±2.4) min and the average hospital stay was (5.3±1.0) d. No complications occurred before or after surgery. All the 6 infants had favorable growth and development. The ovarian cysts were all enlarged again in 1 month after surgery, then gradually shrunk at 3 to 6 months after surgery and completely resolved in 2 cases.Conclusions:Neonatal simple ovarian cysts are more common on the right side of the body and laparoscopic ovarian cyst aspiration has good and safe clinical efficacy.

Current status and pondering of minimally-invasive surgical techniques in radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma / 中华消化外科杂志

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is one difficultly-treated biliary malignancy with poor prognosis, and radical resection offers the only hope of cure for the disease. In recent years, with development and maturation of minimally-invasive techniques, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been attempted in some major medical centers. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically safe and feasible at present, but there is still a lack of large number of case report and evaluation of long-term survival of patients. Based on previous literatures and combined with clinical experiences, the author elaborates on the application status of laparoscopic and robot surgical system in the radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and discusses the key issues that should be paid attention to in carrying out this technology, such as the operator′s prerequisite requirement and patients′ selec-tion, how to ensure the radicality of surgical resection and improve the long-term outcomes.

Diagnosis and treatment of internal hernia after laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

With the development of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, more and more surgeons use laparoscopic techniques and even totally laparoscopic techniques in gastric cancer surgery. However, technological progress brings not only smaller trauma, but also new problems and risks. Compared with traditional open surgery, the high incidence of internal hernia after laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery is an urgent problem to be solved. As the incidence of internal hernia often occurs after discharge, patients usually choose the nearest hospital for diagnosis and treatment due to the urgent course of disease. As a result, patients with internal hernia often have serious complications due to delayed treatment because of the difficulty in diagnosis. Sometimes, there are patients even death. The authors review the relevant research on postoperative internal hernia of gastric cancer in recent years and combine with practical experience to discuss the diagnosis and treatment strategy of internal hernia after laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, aiming to improve the clinicians′ attention to the disease and provide reference for its diagnosis and treatment.

Application of Laparoscopic Surgery in Ileostomy Reversal / 肿瘤防治研究

In colorectal cancer surgery, loop ileostomy is sometimes necessary to prevent anastomotic leakage. Although ileostomy reversal is relatively simple, postoperative complication is inevitable. In recent years, laparoscopic surgery has been gradually applied in ileostomy reversal due to its small trauma, fast recovery, and low complications, exhibiting satisfactory short-term outcomes. This review analyzes the application of the laparoscopic technique in ileostomy surgery and explores the potential of total laparoscopic surgery, aiming to provide a new perspective for the clinical application of laparoscopic ileostomy reversal.

Câncer de reto: qual a melhor técnica para excisão total do mesorreto laparoscópica ou robótica? / Rectum cancer: which is the best technique for total excision of the mesorectum laparoscopic or robotic?

Introdução: As operações laparoscópicas, assistidas por robô e a abertas são técnicas cirúrgicas comumente utilizadas na vida diária. A viabilidade e os resultados em curto e longo prazos dos procedimentos laparoscópicos e robóticos têm sido amplamente relatados. Objetivos: Comparar os dados clínicos e oncológicos da cirurgia assistida por robô e laparoscópica no câncer retal. Métodos: Foram pesquisados o Pubmed/Medline, Embase, e Cochrane Library para artigos relevantes publicados até 2021. Estudos baseados na comparabilidade entre operação assistida por robô e laparoscópica para câncer retal foram designados. Os parâmetros analisados incluíram tempo operatório, conversão para procedimento aberto, perda estimada de sangue, tempo de recuperação da função intestinal, tempo de internação, vazamento da anastomose e complicações pós-operatórias. Resultados: Operação assistida por robô foi associada com maior tempo operatório (342 vs.192 min na cirurgia laparoscópica, p<0,001), menor conversão para procedimento aberto, menor tempo de internação hospitalar e recuperação mais rápida da função intestinal, menores complicações pós-operatórias de forma significativa (p=0,041). A perda estimada de sangue, a taxa de vazamento da anastomose e os resultados oncológicos, incluindo o número de linfonodos extraídos, não mostraram diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Conclusão: A cirurgia assistida por robô para câncer retal mostrou maior tempo operatório, menor conversão, taxas de recuperação da função intestinal mais rápidas e menor permanência no hospital. Seus resultados oncológicos forram semelhantes à cirurgia laparoscópica.

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery and open surgery are the most commonly used surgical techniques in daily living. The feasibility and short- and long-term results of laparoscopic and robotic procedures have been widely reported. Objectives: To compare the clinical and oncological results of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles published until 2021. Studies based on comparability between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were designed. The parameters analyzed included operative time, conversion to open surgery, estimated blood loss, bowel function recovery time, length of hospital stay, anastomosis leak, and postoperative complications. Results: The robot-assisted surgery group was associated with longer operative time (342 vs. 192 min in laparoscopic surgery,p <0.001), lower conversion to open surgery, shorter length of hospital stay, faster bowel function recovery and lower postoperative complications significantly (p=0.041). Estimated blood loss, anastomosis leak rate, and oncological outcomes including the number of lymph nodes extracted showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer showed longer operative time, lower conversion, faster bowel function recovery rates, shorter hospital stay, and similar oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Efficacy of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background: Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach is a novel fascial plane block and provides abdominal analgesia by blocking thoracoabdominal nerves. Our primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of M-TAPA on quality of recovery and pain scores in patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery (Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal approach ‒ TAPP). Methods: Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for elective TAPP under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. After intubation, the patients were randomized into two groups: M: M-TAPA group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 30). M-TAPA was performed with total 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the M group. Surgical infiltration was performed in the control group. The primary outcome of the study was the global quality of recovery score, the secondary outcomes were pain scores, rescue analgesic demands, and adverse effects during the 24-h postoperative period. Results: The global quality of recovery scores at 24 h were significantly higher in the M group (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in the median static and dynamic NRS for the first postoperative 8 h in the M group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The need for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the M group compared to the control group (13 patients vs. 24 respectively, p < 0.001). The incidence of side effects was significantly higher in the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our study, M-TAPA increased patient recovery scores, and provided pain relief in patients who underwent TAPP. Register Number: NCT05199922.

Embarazo y tumor anexial: tratamiento laparoscópico con minilaparotomía. Reporte de caso y revisión bibliográfica / Pregnancy and annexal mass; laparoscopic with minilaparotomy management. Case report and literature review

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores anexiales durante el embarazo requieren una conducta terapéutica segura para la madre y el feto, por lo que el obstetra debe tener claro cuándo la opción quirúrgica es la indicada y cuál la menos agresiva para la madre y el feto. Describir la implementación de la laparoscopia con minilaparotomía en un caso de tumor anexial en el embarazo puede contribuir a conocer las ventajas y desventajas de la estrategia quirúrgica de estos casos. CASO CLÍNICO: Paciente de 29 años, 70 kg de peso, talla de 1.61 m e IMC 27 en curso de las 16 semanas de embarazo, que acudió al servicio de Urgencias debido a un dolor abdominal. Ante la persistencia del síntoma se estableció el diagnóstico de síndrome doloroso abdominal, secundario a un tumor anexial gigante. Se programó para una laparoscopia diagnóstica y operatoria con minilaparotomía. Se dio de alta del hospital a las 24 horas posteriores a la cirugía y el embarazo finalizó a las 39 semanas. METODOLOGÍA: Búsqueda retrospectiva de artículos publicados durante los últimos diez años e indizados en la base de PubMed con los MeSH: adnexal masses pregnancy, adnexal masses pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 34 artículos de revisión, 8 reportes de caso y un editorial, estos últimos 9 se consideraron cuando proveyeron información relevante para el conocimiento de una técnica quirúrgica. Se eliminaron los artículos en los que se utilizó cirugía asistida por robot o técnica con uso de orificios naturales (NOTES), revisiones que fueran exclusivas de patología oncológica, así como casos en niñas, al no disponer de esta tecnología en nuestro medio o no estar en etapa reproductiva, podría incurrirse en un riesgo de transferencia. Así mismo, se eliminaron los artículos sin explicación de las ventajas de la técnica propuesta. CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes embarazadas con tumor anexial gigante, la laparoscopia con minilaparotomía es una opción de tratamiento segura para el feto y la madre. Con esta técnica se consigue una rápida recuperación, disminución de los riesgos de lesión uterina, pronta reintegración a la vida cotidiana y un buen desenlace cosmético.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Adnexal tumors during pregnancy require safe therapeutic behavior for the mother and the fetus, so the obstetrician must be clear when the surgical option is indicated and within the approach which would be less aggressive for the fetal-maternal binomial. Describing the implementation of laparoscopy with mini laparotomy in a case of adnexal tumor in pregnancy can contribute to understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical strategy in these cases. CLINICAL CASE: Patient aged 29 years, weight 70 kg, height 1.61 m and BMI 27 in the course of 16 weeks of pregnancy, who attended the emergency department due to abdominal pain. Given the persistence of the symptom, a diagnosis of painful abdominal syndrome secondary to a giant adnexal tumour was established. She was scheduled for diagnostic and operative laparoscopy with mini-laparotomy. She was discharged from hospital 24 hours after surgery and the pregnancy ended at 39 weeks. METHODOLOGY: A literature search of the last 10 years was performed in Pubmed under the MeSH terms: adnexal masses pregnancy, adnexal masses pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-four review articles, eight case reports and one editorial were included, the latter nine were considered when they provided information relevant to the knowledge of a surgical technique. We eliminated articles in which robot-assisted surgery or a technique using natural orifices (NOTES) was used, reviews that were exclusive to oncological pathology, as well as cases in girls, as this technology was not available in our environment or they were not in the reproductive stage, which could incur a risk of transfer. Likewise, articles that did not explain the advantages of the proposed technique were eliminated. CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients with giant adnexal tumours, laparoscopy with mini-laparotomy is a safe treatment option for the foetus and the mother. This technique achieves a rapid recovery, reduced risk of uterine injury, early reintegration into daily life and a good cosmetic outcome.

Effects of oxycodone hydrochloride and dezocine on hemodynamics and levels of inflammatory factors in patients receiving gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia

Abstract We aimed to compare the effects of oxycodone hydrochloride and dezocine on hemodynamics and inflammatory factors in patients receiving gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. A total of 246 patients were divided into group A and B (n=123). Hemorheology indices were recorded 5 min after anesthesia (T0), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T1), when position was changed 5 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 15 min after pneumoperitoneum (T3), 1 min (T4) and 5 min (T5) after position was restored. Visual analogue scale scores 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation were recorded. Postoperative adverse reactions and visceral pain were observed. The expression levels of inflammatory factors were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay 12 h after operation. Compared with group A, group B had higher heart rate and mean arterial pressure at T2, lower central venous pressure and cardiac output at T1-T3, and higher systemic vascular resistance at T1-T5 (P<0.05). The incidence rate of pain syndrome in group A was lower (P<0.05). Group A had lower tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 expression levels and higher interleukin-10 level than those of group B (P<0.05). For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, oxycodone preemptive analgesia has superior outcomes to those of dezocine

Intra-abdominal desmoid tumors in familial adenomatous polyposis: How much do clinical and surgical variables interfere with their development?

Abstract Objective: Familial Adenomatous Polyposis is a complex hereditary disease that exposes the carrier to a great risk of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). After prophylactic surgery, intra-abdominal desmoid tumors are known to be one the most important cause of death. Therefore, recognition of increased-risk patients and modification of operative strategy may be crucial. Aim: The objective of this study was to estimate the desmoid tumor risk in relation to various surgical and clinical variables. Methods: Patients who had undergone polyposis since 1958 were included in the study. After exclusion criteria were met, those who had developed desmoid tumors were selected to undergo further evaluation. Results: The study revealed that the risk of developing desmoid tumors was associated with various factors such as sex ratio, colectomy, and reoperations. On the other hand, the type of surgery, family history, and surgical approach did not affect the risk of developing desmoid tumors. The data collected from 146 polyposis patients revealed that 16% had desmoid polyps. The sex ratio was 7:1, and the median age at colectomy was 28.6 years. Family history, multiple abdominal operations, and reoperations were some of the characteristics that were common in desmoid patients. Conclusion: Recognition of clinical (female sex) and surgical (timing of surgery and previous reoperations) data as unfavorable variables associated with greater risk may be useful during the decision-making process.

Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy for large volume benign prostate hyperplasia: a report of 30 cases / 现代泌尿外科杂志

【Objective】 To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) in the treatment of large volume benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). 【Methods】 Clinical and follow-up data of 30 patients with large volume BPH treated with LSP in our hospital during Feb.2019 and Dec.2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent extraperitoneal LSP operation. The perioperative and 1-12 month postoperative follow-up data were analyzed. 【Results】 The average prostate volume was (92.4±38.9) mL, operation time (125±45) min, and weight of resected prostate (60.25±16.90) g. The hemoglobin decreased by (12.21±7.25) g/d after operation. No blood transfusion was needed. There was no need for bladder irrigation after operation in 21 cases (70%), and 9 cases (30%) had bladder irrigation time of (0.95±0.49) d. The postoperative catheter indwelling time was (6.92±2.51) d, and hospital stay (5.36±1.63) d. During the follow-up of (9.25±5.4) months, there was 1 case of postoperative intestinal obstruction (Clavien-Dindo grade II), 1 case of transient urinary incontinence (Clavien-Dindo grade I), and 1 case of delayed hematuria (Clavien-Dindo grade I). No urethral stricture occurred. The maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) 3 months after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P0.05). 【Conclusion】 LSP is safe and effective in the treatment of large volume BPH. It has advantages of complete resection of glands, minor bleeding and short postoperative bladder irrigation time. However, it still needs to be confirmed by a prospective control study of large samples.

Management of vena cava tumor thrombus dislodgement in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery / 现代泌尿外科杂志

Renal cancer complicated with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus has been difficult to manage in urological surgery, because it has a complex anatomical relationship and involves vascular blockage of vital organs such as kidney, liver and heart, as well as the blockage and reconstruction of inferior vena cava. In addition, tumor thrombus dislodgement may occur intraoperatively, leading to acute pulmonary embolism, which makes the surgery extremely difficult and risky. In this paper, we report the successful treatment of thrombus dislodgement in a case of right kidney tumor with inferior vena cava thrombus during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and explore the treatment methods, aiming to avoid lethal pulmonary embolism caused by tumor thrombus dislodgement.

Comparison of short-term efficacy between laparoscopic surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for radical resection of rectal cancer / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To explore the feasibility, safety and clinical application value of laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) by comparing the postoperative pathological data, surgery-related variables and postoperative recovery between laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with NOSE and laparoscopic-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis was conducted on 74 patients who underwent radical rectal cancer surgery with anus preservation in the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from July 2017 to April 2022. Among them, 38 cases underwent surgery with specimen extraction through an abdominal auxiliary incision (auxiliary incision group), and 36 cases underwent surgery with specimen extraction through a natural orifice (NOSES group). The differences in the efficacy of the two surgeries were evaluated by comparing the postoperative pathological data, surgical variables, and postoperative recovery of the two groups. 【Results】 There were no statistically significant differences in general data and postoperative pathological data between the two groups (all P>0.05). The NOSES group exhibited significantly shorter operative time, time to first flatus, time to first oral intake postoperatively, and postoperative hospital stay compared to the auxiliary incision group (all P0.05). 【Conclusion】 Laparoscopic surgery with NOSE for rectal cancer is safe and feasible with minimally invasive and accelerated recovery, which is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.

Robot-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy for huge adrenal tumors in 45 cases / 现代泌尿外科杂志

【Objective】 To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal operation for huge (>6 cm) adrenal tumors. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 45 patients with huge adrenal tumors who underwent robotic surgery during Jan.2017 and Dec.2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 28 cases via the transperitoneal approach and 17 cases via the retroperitoneal approach. 【Results】 No patients were converted to open operations. There were no significant differences in postoperative drainage time (2.24±0.44 vs. 2.36±0.49) d, operation time (130.88±5.96 vs. 136.61±8.39) min, blood loss (189.41±13.91 vs. 192.5±12.36) mL and postoperative hospital stay (7.06±0.56 vs. 7.46±0.69) d between the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches. Retroperitoneal approach was better than transperitoneal approach in early postoperative feeding [(38.82±6.75 vs. 74.14±6.57) h, P<0.01] . 【Conclusion】 Robotic surgery is safe and effective in the treatment of large adrenal tumors. The choice of surgical approach should be based on patients’ condition, tumor volume and location.

Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival Outcomes of Elderly Patients (Over 80 Years of Age) with Colorectal Cancer Who Received Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery / 肿瘤防治研究

Objective To examine short-term outcomes and long-term survival of elderly patients (aged over 80 years) with colorectal cancer who received laparoscopic versus open surgery. Methods A total of 313 patients over 80 years old with colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery were included.According to the surgical method, all patients were divided into open-surgery group (n=143) and laparoscopic surgery group (n=170).Baseline data were balanced between the two groups by using propensity score matching.Kaplan-Meier was used to draw the survival curve, and survival was compared by Log rank tests.Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze the effects of all factors on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results After matching, 93 patients were included in each group.The mean intraoperative blood loss, the incidence of overall postoperative complications and gradeⅠ-Ⅱ complications in the laparoscopic surgery group were significantly lower than those in the open surgery group (all P < 0.05).The time to first flatus, the time to oral feeding, and postoperative hospital stays in the laparoscopic surgery group were significantly shorter than those in the open surgery group (all P < 0.05).The mean number of lymph-node dissection was also significantly higher in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (P=0.030).Patients in both groups had similar 5-year OS (P=0.594) and DFS (P=0.295).Multivariate Cox prognostic analysis showed that CEA level > 5 ng/ml, pathological TNM stage Ⅲ, and perineural invasion were independent risk factors for poor OS and DFS. Conclusion Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery can provide better short-term advantages and similar long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer patients over 80 years of age.

Clinical application of robotic-assistant living donor left lateral segmentectomy / 中华器官移植杂志

Objective:To explore the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted living donor left lateral segmentectomy (LDLLS) in a large pediatric liver transplant program.Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed for clinical data of 45 LDLLS donors and recipients from June 2021 to September 2022.Traditional open donor liver resection (n=30) and robotic-assisted segmentectomy (n=15) were performed.Two groups were compared with regards to operative duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative healing and postoperative complications.SPSS 21.0 was utilized for statistical analysis.Independent sample T, paired sample T, Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests were performed for examining the inter-group differences.Results:Operative duration of robot-assisted surgery group was substantially longer than that of traditional open surgery group ( P<0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was less in robot-assisted surgery group was less than that in traditional open surgery group[(106.0±39.8) vs.(251.0±144.8) ml, P=0.001]. Postoperative hospital stay of robot-assisted surgery group was shorter than that of traditional open surgery group[6.0(6.0, 6.0) vs.7.0(6.0, 9.0), P<0.05]. Two cases of postoperative biliary leakage were observed in donor of traditional open surgery group.Among 2 cases of abdominal infection, one was due to biliary leakage from liver section and secondary surgery was then performed.One case of incisional infection and another case of thrombosis occurred in donor of traditional open surgery group.In robot-assisted surgery group, only one donor had amylase elevation.In traditional open surgery group, there were one case of local thrombosis in middle hepatic vein and one case of bile duct stricture.No long-term complications occurred in robot-assisted surgery group during a follow-up period of over 6 months.Finally recipient data analysis indicated that no significant inter-group differences existed in operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative abdominal infection ( P=0.634, P=0.180, P=0.86 and P=0.153). Conclusions:Robotic-assisted LDLLS proves to be be a safe and reliable option for living donor segmentectomy.It is superior to conventional LDLLS in terms of shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative blood loss and fewer postoperative complications.